I want to thank the people of Wisconsin who put up an epic struggle to recall Scott Walker.  Organized labor put in their best efforts to help, but got outspent by what is becoming America’s corporate shadow government and their massive propaganda, oops, I mean advertising campaigns. The fight to oust the man who wants to destroy unions could have been won if Wisconsin's Anti-Walker people had the unreserved support of the national Democratic Party and Barack Obama.  Many of you think that we are seeing an all too familiar pattern of Obama's indifference to the plight of unions and union workers, but it's more than that so read on.

President Obama has a tendency to play it safe, regardless of the consequences.  He seems to analyze almost every move that he makes for potential voter loss or gain.  That's why many of his 2008 campaign initiatives were watered down or abandoned.  That's why he waited almost three years to come out in favor of giving gays the right to marry.  That's why he never made a personal show of support in Wisconsin to help the dump Walker effort.  That's why the only help that he gave Tom Barrett in his campaign against Scott Walker was a lousy last minute tweet on Twitter.

Many people fought long and hard to get the required signatures for a recall vote and all the President could muster was a last minute tweet??  Someone should tell him that being “all in” is a two way street, he can't expect union people to be “all in” for him, if he's not “all in” for us!  Our “two” party system very effectively limits our right of choice to the lesser of two evils.  I don't know about you, but if I were given the chance to choose from a wider range of candidates, from a wider range of parties, I would vote for the guy or gal who does the right thing, regardless of the political consequences!
 


Comments

06/06/2012 4:54pm

Although I am not the world's greatest Barack Obama fan, because he has governed far to the right of his campaigning, and far to the right of what is right, I find this particular issue to be a very tough call, and am not at all confident that his intervention would have been helpful.

I think it might have been resented, and created a backlash. I think the Wisconsin Dems thought it would be good to keep the fight on their side a local one, among friends and neighbors, and let the 'outside intervention' be on Scott Walker's side, which is what happened.

I personally doubt that the election was conducted in a fair manner, and I doubt that the votes were counted accurately. The exit polls, you will recall, had them running neck and neck.

So I'm not going to beat up President Obama over it.

Reply
Jack Wade
06/06/2012 7:11pm

Ray,
That's the beauty of our side of the political fence, it allows for a wide variety of opinions. I still think that Obama has shown a profound indifference to the epic struggle of working people in Wisconsin. I Feel that, someone should have sang the old union song, "Which Side Are You On" to him, about that, his stance on "free" trade issues and many other signs that he supports a stealth pro-corporate agenda. Incidentally, throughout the recall struggle, there were many pro-union Wisconsinites bemoaning the lack of support from national Democrats.
Now that being said, I also agree with you that something, not the cheese, smells rotten in Wisconsin and is starting to remind me of the bad old days of Florida.

Reply



Leave a Reply